Vasco x Ituano was fouled in the deciding match? Former judges think
Vasco beat Ituana 1-0 in Itu yesterday to achieve entry to subsequent 12 months’s Serie A Brazilian Championship. The transfer that led to Nenê’s match-defining penalty was the goal of complaints from São Paulo’s gamers about Raniel’s attainable lack of shot on goalkeeper Jefferson Paulino — earlier than Gabriel Pec took the relaxation and defender Lucas Costa averted together with his naked hand and was despatched off.
Renata Ruel, referee commentator for the Disney channels, introduced on her social networks that the Vasco participant dedicated a transparent foul on the goalkeeper and that it was a ‘massive mistake by the referee and VAR.
“There was a transparent foul on the keeper. Another big mistake by the ref and the CBF VAR. The keeper is in his space, practising his protection and is shipped off, foul. This is the worst 12 months I’ve seen officiating and with a number of interference”, dismissed .
O UOL Esporte contacted different former judges to provide their ideas on the provide, and the responses different extensively. Check:
Carlos Eugênio Simon agreed together with his work associate on the Disney channels: “Mistake. He knocks the keeper down in a struggle for the ball.”
One who didn’t comply with the similar reasoning was Alfredo Loebeling, who added that such a transfer shouldn’t be interference by the video referee.
“This conflict is the results of the sport, it is not the striker’s fault. Two gamers conflict throughout the sport, it is regular in soccer. I truthfully think that for those who begin evaluating this sort of transfer, then it is not attainable, it is not that the function of VAR. The function VAR’s job is to investigate critical refereeing errors. This transfer is interpretive, I would not rating something,” he mentioned.
Judge Guilherme Ceretta de Lima agreed with Renato Ruel and criticized the decide Wilton Pereira Sampaio, who refereed the match and certainly one of the representatives of Brazilian refereeing at the World Cup in Qatar.
“In the World Cup, if he would not give a foul like that… he’ll referee just one sport. He’s searching for bother. In my sport, it is a foul. A referee with that have who tells him that the duty is a number of lack of intelligence. , no person spoke right now about him. It appears he likes to be the protagonist. Patience. Whoever loses credibility is the decide as a complete,” Ceretta opined.
Márcio Chagas, a former referee commentator for Grupo Globo, agrees with the referee’s determination in the match and factors out that the goalkeeper shouldn’t be untouchable inside the space.
“In explicit, I do not know the motive for Ituano’s criticism about this transfer. It was completely nothing. Vasco’s attacker comes first, kicks the ball, shares it with the goalkeeper, a traditional transfer of a ball dispute. It shouldn’t be a foul. Literally an assault. Whoever thinks that he should not contact the goalkeeper inside the space, he didn’t learn the guidelines. The referee made the proper determination,” he analyzed.