The penalty against Cruzeiro was well marked? commenters respond

photograph: Staff Images/Cruise

Cruzeira coach Pezzolano celebrated the cost wasted by CRB

CRB had a penalty within the first half of the sport against Cruzeiro, this Saturday (17/9), on the Rei Pel Stadium, in Macei-AL, within the thirtieth spherical of Serie B. For the referees’ commentators, there was a foul earlier than the penalty.

CRB x Cruzeiro: pictures from the match in Rei Pelo

At 20″ of the primary half, Paulinho Moccelin obtained a cross from Anselmo Ramon on the entrance to the realm and dribbled Machado, who hit the opponent’s leg with a shot.

Before enjoying for Moccelin, the previous Cruzeiro striker hit Geovane on the arm in the beginning of the transfer.

Referee Vinicius Gonalves Dias Araujo (SP) didn’t rating. Video referee Vinicius Furlan didn’t name Araujo to re-evaluate the play on video.

For referee commentators Janette Mara Arcanjo, from TV Globo, and Mrcia Rezende de Freitas, from Rdio Itatiaia, the referee was unsuitable within the provide. In assault, Anselmo Ramon remoted the ball. Check out the opinions of former judges beneath.

Janette Mara Arcanjo – TV Globo

“I’d name an attacking foul as a result of Anselmo Ramon’s hand is a foul for me, the hand goes across the Cruzeiro participant’s neck, not the reference hand, and the foul ought to have been referred to as earlier than the penalty. As for the penalty, little doubt, Machado silenced the CRB participant, however the offense occurred earlier and will have been awarded.”

Mrcio Rezende de Freitas – Itatiaia

“Anselmo Ramon elbowed him within the face. The referee is shut, he would not give a foul, he lets the sport proceed and for me he ought to have given a foul earlier and should not have given a penalty.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.