Grmio lost three assignments on the field due to struggles in the game with Cruzeiro

picture: Reproduction/FC Player

The duel between Grmio and Cruzeiro was marked by fights in the tricolor

Grmio have been punished with the lack of three pitches in Serie B this Tuesday for mass combating by their followers in their 2-2 draw with Cruzeiro at the Arena in Porto Alegre on August 21.

If the penalty is upheld in plenary, the game towards Sport this Tuesday (twentieth) will likely be the final for Tricolor at the Arena in this version of Serie B. The video games towards CSA, Bahia and Brusque can have to be performed at a distinct location.

Due to the confusion amongst the tricolor followers in the Arena, the gacho membership was additionally fined R$ 100,000 by the majority vote of the auditors of the Second Disciplinary Commission.

In the 2-2 draw between Grêmio and Cruzeiro, the referee referred to as out the habits of the Grêmio followers.

I would really like to inform you that in the twenty seventh minute of the first half the match was interrupted for 3 minutes, and in the thirty third minute of the first half once more for 4 minutes, and in each interruptions the purpose was a basic confrontation between the followers. who have been in the designated space of ​​the residence crew. I additionally inform you that in each moments, the intervention of the police was mandatory to cease the confrontation. After the match, we have been knowledgeable by the police commander that these concerned had been arrested and recognized.“.

After analyzing the doc and movies of the disputes, the STJD prosecutor’s workplace condemned Grmio for lack of assure and insurance coverage for the match (Article 211 CBJD – high quality from 100 to 100 thousand R$) and for not taking measures to forestall riots (Article 213, level I CBJD – high quality from 100 to 100 thousand R$). And emphasizing the seriousness of the information, he added to the grievance the lack of management of the field (§1 213 of the CBJD article – lack of management from one to ten video games). Penalties will likely be cumulative as described in Section 184 of the CBJD.

Deputy Attorney General Gustavo Silveira expressed his request for punishment to Grmio.

The state of affairs may be very critical. a sector already banned by STJD as a result of Grmia followers realize it as the fight sector. We see that the followers didn’t respect this pedagogical penalty, a lot in order that they repeated it, twice in the identical game. Do we count on somebody to die, get severely injured? The photos converse for themselves, two basic messes, raised picket cables, folks leaping over the wire to save themselves. Very critical instances needs to be punished in accordance to“, he mentioned.

Reporter Washington Oliveira voted for the punishment of the gacho membership underneath Article 213 of the CBJD and for acquittal quantity 211.

These are acts of utmost savagery and the guild’s recidivism should even be thought of. Grêmia followers repeat the observe in this sense. Here we see folks in the act of collective dispute, which is one thing utterly throwaway. Therefore, I settle for the enchantment and impose a penalty of three video games of lack of command on Grmio with a high quality of R$ 100 thousand in accordance to the higher restrict of Article 213. Furthermore, I counsel that the golf equipment maintain the followers accountable for the harm brought on, as typically the solely factor that impacts folks is the monetary facet“, voted the reporter.

Auditors Iuri Engel and Marcelo Vieira highlighted Grmio’s investigative work to detect offending followers and differed from the reporter utilizing the lack of field command and a high quality of R$ 50 thousand in Article 213. Auditor Diogo Maia and president in observe Carlos Eduardo Cardoso, adopted dosimetry the penalty imposed by the reporter.

Thus, Grmio was acquitted unanimously in the enchantment primarily based on Article 211 of the CBJD and was fined by a majority of votes with a high quality of R$ 100 thousand and with the lack of three field instructions in Article 213, level I., § 1 of the CBJD.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.