Galo has denied fraud in the municipal elections and says the accusation is “blah-blah-blah”.
Oh Athletic has issued a press release of clarification this Thursday night (17) concerning the accusations of potential fraud in the elections of the Deliberative Council of the membership in August. The membership denied any wrongdoing and additionally attacked advisers who blamed the membership.
Read extra: Atlético’s benefactors have highlighted potential fraud in council elections
In an open letter addressed to the president of the membership signed by Cláudio Utsch, Rodolfo Gropen and Lásaro Cândido, the membership’s advisors acknowledged that there was fraud in the final council elections, which elected greater than 150 new members in August. As Utsch defined in the report O Tempo Sportsthey acquired the grievance that a number of administrators had been elected with out fulfilling the situations established in Atlético’s statutes, reminiscent of not having been a member of the membership for greater than two years.
After disclosing the letter, Atlético acknowledged that there was no illegality in the Ordinary General Assembly on August 8. In addition to saying that the accusations are “blah-blah-blah” to create smokestacks, Galo complains that the authors of the letter, Rodolfo Gropen and Lásaro Cândido, have been wrongly chosen, with out following the selections.
Read Atletico’s full assertion:
“1 – The Ordinary General Assembly held on August 8 of the 12 months, which selected a single Gallo Trio record for the 150 vacant positions of elected councilors and 75 vacant positions of alternate councilors, was held inside the fullest legality and equity, obeying it. The “modus operandi” of the final elections of this council ;
2 – The proceedings taken there have been the identical as these of the final General Assembly held with the identical goal, together with the one held when Rodolfo Gropen, director, was president of the Council, throughout which director Lásaro. Cândido held the place of vice chairman of the membership. By the approach, it is vital to make clear that the circumstances of Rodolfo Gropen occurred throughout his election as a councillor. He was appointed a member of the Club in August 2010, however solely grew to become an efficient member of Vila Olímpica in April 2009 – the date funds started – lower than two years after becoming a member of the membership. Likewise, Lásaro Cândido was elected a member of the board on the identical date and the social membership started to pay in June 2009. As a consequence, each now wish to revenue from their turpitude!
3 – The letter contained in the aforementioned stories, signed by the aforementioned administrators, causes us nice curiosity. Mainly as a result of if a process had not taken place inside the guidelines and custom, the blackboard ought to have been contested inside the authorized interval, as regulated by the Club’s Statute, and that didn’t occur. More: if there was a disagreement, it was the responsibility of the president of the Ethics and Disciplinary Council of the Deliberative Council, the place held by councilor Cláudio Utsch at the time of the election, to react instantly in opposition to the alleged violations, that is. what did not occur;
4 – Massa Atleticana should know that every one this “blah-blah-blah” is simply an try to put a “smoke display screen” on the instant identify change of the MRV Arena, sure, that call was by some means accepted. darkish, in the final moments of the Council, the topic was not even talked about in the agenda throughout the evening’s voting;
5 – Since there is no argument to problem the resolution of this Council to place the identify change of our new dwelling to a vote, it is one which tries to deceive the actual intentions, to confuse society and Massa Atleticana, with opportunistic attitudes. and frivolous accusations, typical of those that put private pursuits above the collective;
6 – Obviously, the chance of adjusting the identify of the stadium doesn’t respect the historical past of Elias Kalil. On the different hand Naming a stadium that he had no involvement in or affect doesn’t do justice to the work achieved at the Club. By the approach, the purpose is to not impose any identify, however to democratize this alternative, giving the councilors the alternative to resolve in a clear and well timed method on a problem of such significance and symbolism;
7 – Finally, we reiterate that the Extraordinary Meeting of this Deliberative Council, which is able to happen on November 21, is being held, in addition to all the agendas included in the Convocation.”